HOME | NEXT E-MAIL | E-MAIL INDEX | REPORT

Subject: Proceeding
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 03:33:00 -0500
From: Flash Light
Organization: Solid State Light, Inc.
To: Bob Sturm

Bob,

Hope all is going well. I am starting to get more of a sense of orientation, and so hope for feedback. I had been concerned that a one dimensional harmonic oscillator, although a good example of wave mechanical effects, was a limited representation of the physical reality Tifft observed. I assumed that we needed to look at the QM central force problem, since that's a better description of an atom.

I still would like to see solutions to the central force problem, but now I start to think that Tifft's charts are also a limited representation of the redshifts, attempting to depict them in two dimensions, in order to demonstrated the periodicity. Hence I now see that comparing Tifft's data to the one dimensional harmonic oscillator might prove a valid way to depict the similarity of the periodicities.

Viewed in this way, I see that the domain of Tifft's data is indeed exactly the humps on one side of that potential, (sketch 2b) since the humps on the opposite side would only be encountered by light streaming from the stars Tifft observed in the opposite direction from which Tifft observed them, and hence the redshifts they cause would not be seen by him.

You have not suggested a math program we should use; which program did you use to plot your SE graphic? I would like to begin by just replicating the plot you provided for the low energy states, and expanding the domain there to cosmic distances.

It seems possible to me that these lower states are relevant. The observation of shorter periods (24 km/s and 36 km/s ) could actually apply to higher states, say psi 6&5, while 72 km/s might be related to a hump in, say psi4. Or there may be a period around 50 km/s corresponding to psi4, that would make 72 km/s cause us to look at psi3.

But I look ahead too far. If the humps disappear completely when we change parameters on your SE graphic, then the theory probably fails. Therefore, I feel plotting your SE graphic over a cosmic domain is the next step. So I can try to follow along, I'd like to see the listing of how you programmed your graphic math program. Let me know how you would like to proceed.

Cordially,

Flash
HOME | NEXT E-MAIL | E-MAIL INDEX | REPORT