multi-dimensions.com

   
HOME | NEXT E-MAIL | PRIOR E-MAIL | E-MAIL INDEX | SUMMARY

Subject: RE: Sketches 1 - 3
Date:
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 20:31:26 -0400
From: Carl Weiman cweiman@optonline.net
To: lightart@flash.net

Hi Flash,

Your takes below are extremely good. To clarify my point about plausible numbers I did not mean mechanical nor perspective drawings. I meant to establish some range of plausibility for an abstraction or impressionistic image. For example, the fleeting atomic particles (e.g. muons) which emerge from nuclear reactions exist only as long as one cycle of their wave representation. Thus, in representing them as waves, it would be misleading in a conceptual model to depict multiple ripples. A cycle of a wave can be rendered as a circle, a spinning arrow, a closed path, the wave amplitude. Or none of the above, some inspired construct that resonates conceptually with the underlying principle.

Carl




HOME | NEXT E-MAIL | PRIOR E-MAIL | E-MAIL INDEX | SUMMARY

An art & science collaboration.