SteadyStateTheory.org

   

Steady State Theory


Artist's Progress Report

I have set up this web site to promote discussion of the Steady State Theory. Now I wait to see if the web will bring any interesting responses addressing this topic.

Meanwhile I want to begin examining the original arguments against the Steady State Theory. Based on the original theory, a supposition was put forward about the distribution of radio source stars it predicted. However, observations contradicted the predictions. Let's look at that argument today. Below is a statement of that argument from http://www.schoolsobservatory.org.uk/study/sci/cosmo/internal/steady.htm

"For any sources if the distribution is uniform the fainter ones will be the most distant. If we draw a sphere around us corresponding to a certain brightness then the number of such sources will be proportional to the surface area of that sphere, and thus proportional to radius squared. The number of sources brighter than that certain brightness should be proportional to the volume of that sphere, an hence radius cubed, as they will all lie within the sphere. A graph of the log of the number of sources at a particular brightness, to the log of the number of sources brighter than that brightness, should have a gradient of 1.5 (=3/2) For radio sources the ratio is 1.8 showing that there are more bright radio sources at greater distance, and hence earlier times than would be expected for a steady state universe. The conclusion is that the universe is evolving or at least changing."

There are several assumptions in this argument. The one that strikes me first is the assumption that the brightness of a radio source is uniform over time. If there were any reason why older radio sources would be more intense, then that would account for the more distant stars (the "older" ones) showing such a gradient. From Wikipedia, "Even during its current life in the main sequence, the Sun is gradually becoming more luminous (about 10% every 1 billion years), and its surface temperature is slowly rising."


© NASA

An art & science collaboration.